In a confidential document entitled, ‘The Way Forward: Relearning the Lessons ofTaylorism,’ the organisation describes its approach as “a blueprint for treating a group of passionate people as cogs in a poverty and corruption-ending machine. And then replicating that machine wherever we can get funding to do so.”
I'd love to read some comparative work on the non-profit, aid crowd's org structures. Different structures are better suited to different contexts and/or particular, preferred outcomes. Perhaps AidHope's structure is, in fact, suitable to their aims, even if it looks hypocritical.